LawMachineChicago Injury Attorneys
HomePractice AreasAreas We ServeAboutBlogResourcesUpload Crash Report
Call (312) 222-0202Free Case Review
  1. Home
  2. /Blog
  3. /Comparative Fault Illinois
Personal Injury

Understanding Comparative Fault

How Illinois Shared Liability Laws Affect Your Case

By LawMachinePublished November 15, 2024

In many personal injury cases, the question of fault is not black and white. Illinois follows a modified comparative fault system that can significantly impact the amount of compensation you receive. Understanding how this system works is essential for anyone pursuing a personal injury claim.

Comparative fault, also known as comparative negligence, is a legal principle that assigns a percentage of fault to each party involved in an accident. In Illinois, your compensation is reduced by your percentage of fault.

Example

If you are awarded $100,000 in damages but found to be 20% at fault, your compensation would be reduced to $80,000.

Illinois follows a modified comparative fault system with a 50% threshold. This means that if you are found to be 50% or more at fault for the accident, you are completely barred from recovering any compensation. You can only recover damages if your percentage of fault is 49% or less.

Critical Rule

If you are 50% or more at fault, you recover nothing. This makes fighting fault allegations crucial to your case.

Fault is determined based on several factors, including:

  • Police reports and accident reconstruction
  • Witness testimony
  • Physical evidence from the scene
  • Traffic camera footage or dashcam video
  • Expert witness analysis
  • Medical records linking injuries to the accident

Car Accident Scenario

A driver runs a red light and hits your vehicle. However, you were speeding at the time of impact. The jury determines the other driver was 80% at fault and you were 20% at fault. If your total damages are $200,000, you would receive $160,000 (reduced by your 20% share of fault).

Slip and Fall Scenario

You slip on a wet floor in a grocery store that had no warning signs. However, you were texting on your phone and not watching where you were walking. The court may find the store 70% at fault for not posting warnings and you 30% at fault for not paying attention.

Insurance companies frequently use comparative fault arguments to reduce the amount they pay on claims. They may argue that you were partially at fault for the accident, even when you were not, to lower your settlement amount. Having an experienced attorney who can counter these arguments is critical to protecting your full compensation.

Need Legal Help?

Get a free case evaluation from an experienced Illinois personal injury attorney.

Free Case EvaluationCall (312) 222-0202

Free consultation • No fee unless we win

Why Choose LawMachine?

  • No Fee Unless We Win

    You pay nothing upfront

  • Written Fee Agreement

    Fee and expense terms in writing

  • Personal Attention

    Work directly with your attorney

  • Free Consultation

    Get your case reviewed today

Related Resources

  • How Much is My Personal Injury Case Worth in Illinois?
  • Illinois Statute of Limitations for Personal Injury Cases
  • Spinal Cord Injuries from Accidents: Long-Term Impact and Compensation
  • How Social Media Can Affect Your Personal Injury Case

Ready to Get the Compensation You Deserve?

Contact LawMachine today for a free consultation. We fight for real everyday people who have been injured.

Start Your Free Case EvaluationCall (312) 222-0202